Trending Today ...
Route 66 spirit fuels “6 by 6” art

KINGMAN — In a community of just under

no kings
No Kings rally set for Oct. 17 in

KINGMAN, Ariz. – Kingman Freethinkers will be hosting the

Hobbs favored to win another term despite debate

PHOENIX — Andy Biggs appeared on stage during an

Kingman Moose Lodge raises funds for ARC

KINGMAN, Ariz. – The Royal Order of Moose,

judge bench
Duren takes plea in child porn, bestiality case

LAKE HAVASU CITY, Ariz. – A Lake Havasu

courtroom
Eight months for fatal hit and run

BULLHEAD CITY, Ariz. – A hit and run vehicle-pedestrian

Thank you for reading The Standard newspaper online!

AZ Supreme Court denies review of Horne lawsuit against AG Mayes

judge's gavel

PHOENIX – This week, the Arizona Supreme Court declined review of Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne’s lawsuit against Attorney General Kris Mayes, Governor Katie Hobbs, and ten Arizona school districts over a dual-language learning model, thereby preserving the Attorney General’s win from the lower courts.

“This is a great result for the people of Arizona. The Supreme Court’s decision confirms that the Superintendent has no authority or standing to sue school districts that are doing their jobs by implementing a structured English immersion model approved by the State Board of Education.” said Attorney General Kris Mayes. “My Attorney General Opinion on this issue made clear that the State Board, not the Superintendent, has the authority to approve or modify structured English immersion models. A lot of taxpayer dollars could have been saved if the Superintendent had just followed that opinion.”

In 2023, the Superintendent issued a letter to school districts demanding that schools stop instructing English language learner students in a dual-language teaching model even though the State Board had approved the model. Attorney General Mayes issued an opinion explaining that only the State Board of Education has the authority to eliminate a dual-language model, not the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The Superintendent responded to the Attorney General opinion with this lawsuit.

By denying review of the lawsuit, the Arizona Supreme Court preserved the lower court’s dismissal of the Superintendent’s lawsuit on the grounds that Superintendent lacked the authority to sue or standing to sue the Attorney General, Governor, and school districts on this issue.