Trending Today ...
Time to Separate?

Pastor Kent Simmons Most who are following the

Teen charged with pushing pot to kids

Matthew Swaim BULLHEAD CITY – A Bullhead City

Reply to Morpeth letter

Dear Editor,  Maybe Leslie is comparing the Marshall

Wilfred (Bill) Glass

Wilfred (Bill) Glass was born in Strasburg, North

Armed robbery crime spree nets prison time for

LAKE HAVASU CITY – A mandatory prison plea

Fall Semester Enrollment Now Open – Sign Up

MOHAVE COUNTY - Mohave Community College is now

Thank you for reading The Standard newspaper online!

Zoning development request denied

Concerns voiced regarding ambiguous development plans

KINGMAN – The Kingman Planning and Zoning Commission tabled a rezoning request during its March 10 meeting. The matter involved two properties being rezoned from rural residential to the C-3 commercial designation.

The near one-acre and near two-acre parcels are both located in the vicinity of North Bank Street and Gordon Drive. Commission members Charmayne Keith and Scott McCoy expressed concern that a specific development has not been identified for the larger parcel.

On behalf of his father property owner Michael Seitz, Gregory Seitz told Commissioners they are leaning toward an affordable housing project but remain uncertain given current economic instability.

“We’re still not sure so our intent was to get the highest zoning that we can so that we have the greatest opportunity for development, whatever would be best at the time, according to what the economy is doing,” Seitz said.

Keith noted that she would oppose vehicle storage and towing enterprises and other permitted uses allowed under C-3 if the parcel owner is not committed to a specific project.

“Not knowing what the proposal is, I’m not willing to support it,” McCoy agreed.

The Commission voted to table the matter until the owner could better answer development questions.

One thought on “Zoning development request denied

  1. Good job on the part of the commissioner’s- Without a specific plan, just blindly resining isn’t a good idea for the community- besides c-3 is commercial, the owners of building affordable housing would be looking for multi family zoning – so right there is a red flag

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *